Rhode Island State Technical Committee Meeting Notes
November 2, 2006
USDA Conference
Room
Warwick, RI
Attending: Rob Swanson, FSA;
Tim Pindell, and J. Eric Scherer, RI NRCS; Kris Stuart, Southern RI
Conservation District; Ken Ayars, RI DEM Division of Agriculture; Liz Scott, RI
DEM, OWR; Michael Pezza, State Committee, USDA, FSA: and Tom Sandham, Eastern RI
Conservation District; Rick Pace, EcoAssets; Loren Thurn, RI Ag Council; Al
Bettencourt, RI Farm Bureau; Ton Abbott, RI DEM, DFE; Gene Pepper, RI DEM,
Division of Ag; Greg Modesto, US FWS; Stephen Del Pozzo, SRICD.
Introductions, Review Agenda, and Opening Comments
Eric Scherer on behalf of Roylene Rides at the Door,
NRCS-RI State Conservationist, welcomed everyone and thanked them for
attending.
NEPA Update and FY 07 Cost List
Reena Shaw, State Economist, presented (see handout) to the
STT the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) update on the effort by New
England / New York NRCS offices to comply with NEPA requirements for providing
technical and financial assistance to producers through the Farm Bill. Each of
the conservation practices used in the Northeast were reviewed using a flow
diagram illustrating resource concerns vs. benefits. A sample flow diagram was
provided for use by the Team to see the process by which NRCS is addressing this
requirement (handout passed out).
Dr. Shaw also discussed the biggest change in the cost list
this year resulting from new rules issued by NHQ stipulating that beginning in
FY 2007 States must utilize the average cost type (AC) cost type for all
structural practices and the Flat Rate (FR) cost type to provide incentive
payments for management practices for all financially-assisted practices through
AMA, EQIP, and WHIP (see attachement).
In prior years our office and other NRCS offices used the
Average not to exceed a maximum (AM) cost share type. The AM cost share type was
typically listed as requiring an engineer’s estimate. This allowed our staff to
price-out a given practice, provide the client with the projected cost
information, noting that we would pay some percentage of that cost (usually 50%
to 75%). We are no longer allowed to use this cost share type.
The average cost share rate requires that we list in the
cost list, our estimate of the average cost of installation for practices or
components of the practice. The client will receive a cost share (typically 50%
to 75%) of the average cost listed in the cost list.
To transform practices listed as having an AM cost share
type to an AC cost type we held several meetings with our engineers and various
field staff. In an attempt to break-down larger practices to generate average
costs based on the size of the practice such as, we have added components to
several practices.
We also tried to project inflationary increases in costs.
Members of the STT were provided with a copy of the drafted FY 2007 Cost List
and a glossary of past and current cost share types.
FY 07 Farm Bill Outreach Efforts
Jeanne Comerford, Public Affairs Specialist presented a
handout with the FY 07 Farm Bill Outreach events to date (see handout). Mike
Kenyon, District Conservationist, indicated that approximately 12 individuals
attended the last October meeting in Northern Rhode Island and the next event
was planned for November, 8, 2006 at the USDA Service Center in Warwick. The
Team was asked to spread the work on the next meeting.
Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP)
Mike Combs, acting EQIP program Manager presented handouts
on:
-
Slide Presentation of EQIP FY 2007 Policy;
-
Slide Presentation of Developing State and Local
Questions (National slides off of AERT website);
-
Slide Presentation of RI State and Local Questions from
FY 2006 Ranking Tool; Handout - Resource Concerns and Conservation Practices
On the 2006 Ranking Tool; and
-
Handout - The Resource Concerns and Conservation
Practices that were on the CPPE website
With these handouts Mr. Combs discussed the ranking
criteria and the relationship between the National, State, and Local Questions
and the resource concerns and conservation practices and how the points
accumulate according to what is selected.
He also passed out handouts;
Mr. Combs asked for questions and if the group to compare
wanted to change/add anything on the 2006 Ranking Tool from the CPPE website. He
explained that this would be easier to do at this point, instead of adding them
after the 2007 Ranking Tool was developed.
It was decided that once the draft FY 2007 Ranking tool was
developed that there would be a ‘beta’ test set up at the office and Mr. Combs
would invite the Team members to attend to see how the tool worked. Many of the
Team members were interested in attending this session. Mike would set this up
in the third or fourth week of November.
Wildlife Habitat Incentives Program (WHIP)
On behalf of the WHIP Program Manager, Mr. Scherer
presented the FY 2007 WHIP Policy for the STT review in the form of a draft
Bulletin (handout). The policy reflects changes proposed at the last STT
meeting:
-
Grassland Habitat has a new 15 acre minimum
-
Clearing second growth forestland/shrubland can only be
done if the land was previously grassland prior to 1976.
-
There will be a meeting at the Grange in Exeter on
Stream Continuity Project next month.
Mr. Scherer also passed out several handouts, including a
WHIP brochure, a fact sheet and the application process for FY 2007.
Field Office Technical Guide Update
Tim Pindell, Soil Conservationist presented a handout on
the recent release on Conservation Practice Standards (NHCP Notice 141). He
briefly discussed the changes for 11 updated National Standards. Additionally,
one standard, Wildlife Watering Facility (648) was cancelled, and is to be
merged with (614) Watering Facility - to cover both livestock and wildlife.
Also, a new code (431) - Above Ground, Multi-Outlet Pipeline replaces the
existing standard (430HH) - Irrigation Water Conveyance, Rigid Gated Pipeline.
Of the 11 standards in Notice 141, five are currently RI standards and will be
scheduled for updating to reflect the changes in the NHCP release.
The STT was informed of two draft NHCP standards posted on
the web for review and comment, with the deadline for comments. 342d1 (critical
area planting) - comments are due Nov 3, and 393d2 (filter strip) - comments are
due Dec 1.
The Southern Rhode Island Conservation District
implementing a study looking at livestock operations and phosphorous loading
in the Saugatucket Watershed. They have been able to identify a number of
livestock operations otherwise not known before and have been able to
provide these operations with information on programs available to them on
manure management.
Next Meeting
Next meeting: January 11, 2007
(9:30AM – 12 Noon).
<Back to...
|